<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<oai_dc:dc
    xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/
    http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">

      <dc:title>Necklet (view 4)</dc:title>
  
  
  
      <dc:description>[Source - Chloe Rushovich for FHYA, 2020, transcription of KwaZulu-Natal Museum database extracts: Entry in the Accessions Register (Ethnology Book 1) for Accession 616: &amp;quot;Zulu necklet (ulimi)&amp;quot;. Next to this Accession is written: &amp;quot;Moved from Nos 48/49 - 3 specimens&amp;quot;: Entry in the Accessions Register (Ethnology Book 1) for Accession 48: &amp;quot;Native bead necklet of various patterns&amp;quot;. Next to this listing is written: &amp;quot;Cancelled see Nos 616 &amp;amp; 690&amp;quot;. Entry in the Accessions Register (Ethnology Book 1) for Accession 49: &amp;quot;Native bead anklet&amp;quot;. So Accession Numbers 48, 49, 616 and 690 are entangled in some way (see notes). Entry in the Accessions Register (Ethnology Book 1) for Accession 690: &amp;quot;Zulu necklaces constituting a letter. Zulu name Umampapeni. - not in dictionary [later addition in a different handwriting]. (The idea of the cross was attained from the Red Cross on hospital trains and wagons.).&amp;quot;]</dc:description>
  
  
  
      <dc:date>[18-?]</dc:date>
  
  
  
  <dc:identifier>https://fhya.org/necklet-view-4</dc:identifier>

            <dc:identifier>616B</dc:identifier>
      
  
  
  
  
  
</oai_dc:dc>